A frequent criticism of Jovians’ proposed energy extraction from Casimir cavities using hydrogen atoms is that the energy required to push the gas into the Casimir cavity will at least equal the energy released by the photon. I am suggesting that reactionary forces are translated 90 degrees to the temporal axis where the Jovion method harnesses normally chaotic virtual particles to organize boundary conditions with hydrino compounds that formed while inside the casimir cavity. I am proposing that the temporal displacemnt allowed by Casimir field exposes the orbitals to organized virtual particles and chemical bonds formed during this exposure will be broken as the compound exits the field by accumulating pressure from the particles trying to collapse the orbitals back into our “flatter” plane.

Dr Mills of Black LightPower claims the transition from hydrogen to hydrino is non radiative. I agree because the orbital gets no closer to the orbital. the relativistic model of hydrogen implies the orbital is displaced on the time axis from the nucleus not surrounded by the orbital. I am suggesting a halo trailing to one side of the nucleus which is normally negligible but within a casimir field can provide all the needed displacement between electron and proton allowing orbital diameters to take on normally disallowed values in our plane. As the atoms entered the Casimir cavity the boundary condition holding the electron away from the nucleus got wider on the time axis and the electron orbital simply remained stationary relative to a moving boundary condition reshaping its’ quadric volume between time and spatial components under the influence of Casimir force. the electron remains at -13.6 eV even though the orbital diameter shrinks far beyond zero state. If the atom exits the field without forming a molecule it will simply untwist. I am proposing that investigators need a covalent bond to occur while atoms are inside the exclusion field or you gain nothing. The energy gain only occurs for bonds formed while the atoms are twisted on the time axis. The gain is provided by virtual particles forming organized boundaries with the newly formed compounds or molecule’s orbitals which are locked into their novel temporal orientation by chemical bonds. these novel orientations are preserved by the bond but while exiting the cavity the orbitals experience increasing opposition from accumulating virtual particles trying to squeeze these “fat” bonds back into the normal “skinny” orientation of least resistance to fit into our plane vs the wider temporal axis inside a casimir cavity. This is similar to the difference between our plane and the even flatter plane of an event horizon from which perspective we appear to be the fast moving reactants taking a similar temporal detour to the gas atoms inside a casimir cavity. The new hydrino molecules’ orbital orientations find themselves interleaved into the time stream instead of being swept to the shore like normal matter. At some point the covalent bond will be broken by the increasing boundary potentials and these “temporal shells” will start to collapse and reform in an avalanche creating the signature black light plasma described in the Black Light product. Since this is already so speculative let me compare this to a related story about an event horizon….

Johny learns his father’s space cruise ship is being sucked into a black hole- unlike most disasters this will be a lifetime tragedy due to relativity -although mere moments for his father it will be hundreds of years before the spaceship is actually crushed by the gravitational forces seeping through the inertial dampers. Johny however is calm because his new invention multiplies a spaceship drives power and dampers far beyond previous levels and he knows that time is now his friend! After years of preparation Johnny and a rescue ship dive into the event horizon toward the doomed ship – As the doomed ship grows larger Johnny initiates the device that will lock their shields together so they can drag the crippled ship out of the gravity well. The rescue ship is able to lock onto the crippled ship on the first attempt and they quickly combine their navigation and engines into a single dual ship mode. they start pulling away from the black holes gravitational grasp and are already approaching the
point where the 2 ships first merged marking their actual starting point on their return. Johnny knows time is traveling faster outside the event horizon and wants to get his father home while there is still family left that will recognize him. As the dualship climbs the gravity well it is pushed by temporal forces forming boundary conditions with the dualships merged fields. Both ships have molecular structures twisted on the time axis by the curved space inside the well which would simply untwist if each ship returned individually but the two fields forming the dualship bond are now locked one against the other unable to twist back to normal even as the dualship
continues to climb the well returning to flat space. The resistance seems to increase in steps and Johny hopes both ships will still have escape velocity when the binding field breaks and both ships break free. With a flash Johnny’s ship suddenly emerges from the black hole and they are immediately contacted by the rescued ship already waiting for them. His father’s face appears on the com to tell Johnny only weeks have elapsed since Johnny dove into the black hole and to chide him about taking so long :_) Apparently dad and crew have been waiting 3 days for them to reappear. Johnny then realized the implications of his fathers communication. He assumed that the rescue attempt would return all travelers to a point at least twenty years after the rescue missions entry into the black hole but somehow they were all returned only weeks later. The temporal resistance that eventually tore apart the binding field of the dualship had combined with the ships vector so that the dualship did not follow the curved gravitational well of the black hole back to normal flat space. The dualship had experienced true temporal navigation, the fields acted as temporal rudders their molecular orbitals unable to twist freely with the changing curvature of the well the orbitals became interleaved in the time stream forming boundary conditions with vacuum fluctuations which can lift or submerge a ship from its time frame. the orientations once frozen by the binding field retained an orientation, a resistive rudder angle, that favored that temporal coordinate which combined with ships drive to form a composite temporal spatial vector submerging the dualship into the plane of the gravity well on the shortest return path to flat space. Johnny wondered what would have happened if the field had not broken – if the two ships had escaped the event horizon with their binding field intact ..would they appear like tiny spaceships still miles away or should i say hours away since they would still be displaced on the temporal axis not the normal spatial axis. Would they be torn apart by temporal force the moment they dropped their shields?

The Casimir effect mirrors this anomally but unlike an event horizon where relative time appears slow the relative time inside a Casimir cavity appears very fast, hence my suspicion that catalysts are just an indicator of casimir cavities or outcroppings of casimir geometry. Two hydrogen atoms enter an exclusion field. If they form a covalent bond and try to diffuse back out of the cavity as a molecule they have a similar dilemma. Their orbital orientations are locked when the covalent bond forms so they are unable to twist paralell to the changes in curved space as the molecule exits the field. the molecule will either return still “twisted” on the temporal axis or the virtual particles will tear the covalent bond apart and release the signature black light plasma as it accelerates through the equivalent of sub zero state shells -actually temporal shells -perhaps 7 more shells to maintain symetry and each a possible family suggesting a 149 combinations when mixed with normal space shells. On the other hand if the molecule escapes unbroken we actually have the more desirable outcome since it would make possible all the science fiction devices described in the first paragraph by providing the building block “oar” scientists have needed since the beginning of space exploration.

Note: electrons drawn from perspective of time axis where the “PRESENT” time frame forms the horizontal axis thru all nuclei
in what we perceive as a 3D universe

I employ a simplified visual model of space-time. It is not a detailed theory but I find it a useful visualization tool. I consider vacuum fluctuations as virtual particles squeezing through a nuclei wide mesh of all matter in the universe. This “Present” time frame is being pulled forward in time. The mesh appears flat from the perspective of the time axis but in normal space appears to stretch infinitely to trace out our macroscopic 3D illusion of reality much like an electron beam traces out 2d image on a TV screen. In normal space electrons orbit around the nucleus but,from the perspective of the time axis, our electrons trail behind in halo shells and orbitals occuring knee deep into the “Past”. They are tethered to the “present” by proton attraction but are displaced back into the shadow of the nuclei by virtual particles in the time stream. These Virtual particles already squeezed thru and around our nuclei in the “present” to form the classical wake pattern reflected in orbital shells. they also provide the energy that keeps all matter from agregating and keeps sending electrons back down to repell against themselves and form the orbitals. Virtual particles form a stream that pushes orbitals straight downstream like the tail of a weathervane but orbitals forever rebound back out into the stream due to mutual repulsion. Recent work by Christian Beck at the University of London and Michael Mackey at McGill University may have resolved that dark energy is nothing other than zero-point energy. In Measureability of vacuum fluctuations and dark energy and Electromagnetic dark energy they propose that a phase transition occurs so that zero-point photons below a frequency of about 1.7 THz are gravitationally active whereas above that they are not. I suggest these larger gravitationally active virtual particles below 1.7THZ are displaced around our nuclei too large to squeeze through. I further suggest that smaller virtual particles above 1.7THZ are able to permeate the nuclei and are more temporally active. The two types of particles reassemble behind the “past” side of the nuclei and displace the electrons into the familiar shells of standard theory with which we are familiar. The electrons then oscillate between mutual repulsion of other electrons and the virtual particles in the time stream trying to push them back into the shadow of the nuclei. It is this time stream that science seeks to harness called zero point energy. I approximate “NOW” to be about one nuclei wide because the uncertainty principle proves that electrons are already knee deep in the time stream. The principle states we can only know either the position or momentum of an electron but not both at the same time. We also know temporal anomalies are subjective and that someone standing on the electron would move smoothly from one location to another by simple physical displacement in the time stream totally aware of both his momentum and position. This suggests that the electrons are outside of the single time frame we call the “present”. The pressure of virtual particles squeezing through and around our nuclei in the “present” time frame increases with matter and has direction that we commonly call “down” but from the perspective of time stream is actually the past. the stream exerts pressure on all matter like a child sweeping a fish net thru his aquarium to clear out little squares of paper. The bigger the paper blocking the pores the more downward pressure we feel. This downward orbital orientation is only slightly mitigated to a “folded back” orientation when these atoms form bonds like wings on a butterfly they minimize resistance to the time stream. Less folded back molecules such as hydrinos mentioned previously can only form in Casimir exclusion fields. To account for why some hydrinos become stable molecules while others rip apart immediately I propose that smaller cavities form more exclusive fields resulting in “straighter” molecules which accumulate more force against the orbital boundaries than the bond can resist

February 2, 2009
Much attention has been drawn by Rowan University’s’ August 12th validation of excess heat generated by off the shelf chemicals in a recipe provided by Black Light Power. Rowan had previously validated even greater energy gains in October 08 using hydrogenated Rayney nickel provided by BlackLight Power but because the material was not prepared at Rowan there was controversey regarding the “preparation” of the powder. In both cases the energy produced exceeded known chemistry and implies a mechanism somewhere between chemical and nuclear. This subject of anomalous heat production has existed for decades most notably interactions between monatomic hydrogen and different catalysts. From Ponds and Fleischman in the 80′s to Irving Langmuir’s circa 1939 Nobel Prize work showing Atomic Hydrogen recombining to form H2 and excess heat. Trying to unravel this mystery has taken many paths, Cold Fusion, bubble fusion, LENR, cavitations and more. Some of the theories behind the most successful methods are even more controversial because they claim a fractional quantum state where the orbital drops below ground state. I am proposing this is a relativistic state and the controversy regarding fractional quantum states of hydrogen is nothing more than semantics. Black Light Power has defined the term “hydrino” for their interpretation of fractional quantum state.
Since Black Light Power has already defined the “hydrino” and because “fractional quantum state hydrogen” is also misleading I prefer to use the term “relativistic hydrogen” as proposed in a 2005 paper by Jan Naudts“ On the hydrino state of relativistic hydrogen atom”. Naudts argues that detractors of fractional state hydrogen overlook relativistic effects inside a Casimir cavity. These relativistic effects were discussed in a 2002 paper by Italian researchers Di Fiore et all “Vacuum fluctuation force on a rigid Casimir cavity in a gravitational field”. They proposed the possibility of verifying the equivalence principle for the zero-point energy of quantum electrodynamics, by evaluating the force, produced by vacuum fluctuations, acting on a rigid Casimir cavity in a weak gravitational field. Their calculations show a resulting force has opposite direction with respect to the gravitational acceleration, Their proposal indicates equivalent acceleration outside the cavity relative to inside the cavity. Their calculated 10 E^-14 N of force is inconsequential but represents the overall difference between concentration areas in the lattice nuclei vs depletion areas in the Casimir cavities sandwhiched between the plates. The Casimir force felt by monatomic gas diffused in these cavities or between the lattice nuclei is magnitudes higher than the DiFiore effect. Casimir force represents a VERY localized gravitational depletion zone as opposed to the isotropic concentration of a gravity well. To exploit this localized depletion zone of longer wavelength vacuum flux that QED refers to as “up conversion” mon atomic gas must be delivered to these cavities in such a way to allow oscillation between monatomic and diatomic states. The up conversion accelerates H1 to “fast H1″ while the appropriate rigid catalyst impedes “fast H2″ motion and returns the molecule to monatomic energy levels. the photons emitted by “fast H2″ formation are very real and would explain the widened Balmer spectrum reported with Black Light Plasma. I believe that Jan Naudts suggestion of a relativistic solution is the key to this long standing mystery of anomalous heat. This suggests that time is occurring at multiple seconds per second for atoms diffused inside the cavity inversely proportional to the cube of the distance between “plates” as indicated by the Casimir formula for non-ideal conductors. I suggest the normal gravitational field for Casimir plates is modified as plates approach each other in Casimir geometry forming a “depletion” zone between them that upsets the normally isotropic field very locally between the plates. The field is concentrated in the metal lattice which draws down the confined reservoir of a Casimir cavity to create the depletion zone.

Locally hydrogen remains just hydrogen and the Bohr radius is never violated. The small acceleration inside the Cavity accumulates into time dilation and Lorentz contraction which would explain catalytic action but with the appropriate rigid Casimir cavity catalytic action can be leverage into producing excess heat. In the case of the skeletal catalyst used by Mills, Rayney nickel, it is evident that H1 is the preferential state for diffusion. H2 is denied mobility compared to H1 which is able to accumulate velocity inside the exclusion field of the cavity. The small difference in gravitational acceleration calculated by Di Fiore et all represents a diverging relativistic frame allowing the Warkowski space time temporal coordinate of H1 to vary inside the cavity vs. outside the cavity. I prefer to call this “relativistic hydrogen” as opposed to Mills and others who refer to it as fractional quantum states, Their empirical data and calculations of 137 such fractional states varying from 1/2 to 1/137 appears correct but I propose they should be considered perspective multipliers which solve for the trig portion of the Bohr radius measured in our reference frame due to Lorentz contraction. This suggest that Hydrogen orbitals inside a depletion zone can twist their orientation on the time axis in quantum number steps. Dr Mills already claims these fractional states to be non radiative which agrees with my theory that the orbital radius is actually unchanged and the 4D orientation is responsible for the fractional states as observed from a reference frame outside the cavity.

N =1 is assumed to be 45 degree for flat space sharing dimensions equally. As Velocity increases toward C on spatial axis XYZ time is suppressed (event horizon), As velocity increases toward C on time axis the spatial axis XYZ are suppressed (Casimir cavity).

If relativistic H1 forms relativistic H2 it is also denied mobility just like hydrogen molecules near the mouth of the cavity that were unable to diffuse into the depletion zone. The relativistic H2 however has accumulated velocity, is still in a frame with a different acceleration rate and is subject to gas law – heat still trying to diffuse the molecule in opposition to this confinement. The vacuum fluctuations of this still diverging relativistic frame build “organized” boundary conditions with the covalent bond of the confined molecule which breaks the bond and restores the atoms to monatomic levels using ZPE. You could also say the energy is provided by gas law for those opposed to ZPE :_)

When relativistic H2 forms inside a cavity it emits a photon then becomes spatially confined in opposition to the moving frame and gas law. When these forces accumulate to break the covalent bond the atoms reorient to the appropriate “fractional quantum” angle for the local Casimir geometry and the cycle starts over in a photon emitting cascade between H1 and H2 that does not consume the hydrogen. This continues until the atoms escape the cavity or the geometry overheats and grows shorts that relieve the depletion zone.

A patent US 7,379,286 B2 awarded May 27, 2008 to Bernard Haisch and Garret Moddel leverages Casimir force which they refer to as Casimir -Lamb shift. Their planned prototype of Casimir columns formed by milled colums through mettalic plates seperated by insulation layers are arranged in a stack. they drill an array of .1 micron columns through the stack which unlike Rayney nickel has a feed through path seperated by insulators that force the depletion zones in each plate of each column to translate through its full range of values which is a vast improvement over the skeletal catalyst used by Mills. A recent discovery by Peng Chen at Cornell University Finds nanotubes only have catalytic action at ends and at defects where plate spacing changes. This indicates The Haisch – Moddel cavity columns with insulation breaks is superior to skeletal catalysts used by Mills. Although the skeletal catalyst has stronger depletion fields due to much smaller geometry the Rowan validations appear to release a burst of energy and then the Mills reactors are finished while the Haisch – Moddel model is designed to run continuously. Their .1u diameter cavities are much weaker, form columns that allow circulation control and mixing ratios of diatomic to monatomic gases and simpler heat exchange. Although the methods of confinement and the physics being exploited differ they both require the Casimir cavity to establish a differential zone where normal reactionary forces are partially suspended allowing what appears to be overunity but is actually rectifying energy from the ZPF.

Relativistic Hydrogen extracts ZPE (pre-paper)
March 12th, 2009
Relativistic Hydrogen molecules extract energy
from Vacuum Fluctuations
Francis X Roarty
Electronics Technician
E-mail froarty572@comcast.net
Abstract
The claims of sub zero states of hydrogen have been controversial for years and caused the study of this field to languish for what may prove to be nothing more than semantics. A 2005 paper by Jan Naudts paper (5 August 2005). “On the hydrino state of the relativistic hydrogen atom” [5] contends that the sub zero state argument overlooks relativistic effect inside Casimir cavities. Relativistic hydrogen implies a temporal axis solution where the hydrino orbital remains stationary relative to a moving boundary as the atom rotates away from our plane reshaping the 4D boundary. The Casimir cavity enlarges the temporal axis so the nucleus and its boundaries twist wide on the temporal axis while contracting the orbital diameter in our plane. Note in my animation of a hydrogen atom VS Hydrino atom from a 4D perspective – the orbital trails the nucleus like a halo and does not surround the nucleus. In hydrogen the temporal displacement between the nucleus and orbital is negligible compared to zero state restrictions but in the hydrino the temporal displacement dominates the zero state displacement. the quadric volume of boundary conditions is unchanged but reshaped “skinny” in our plane while growing “fat” on the temporal axis. The minimal approach to the nucleus is still observed but now depicted in the animation by a smaller more distant nucleus displaced outward on the time axis courtesy of the Casimir exclusion field. Longer Vacuum fluctuations making up this boundary have been twisted into the temporal plane to fit between the plates – they appear faster from our perspective and twist the boundary conditions of any matter that translates through them.

1 Introduction
Black Light Power [1] , founded by Dr Randell Mills, was confirmed in an October 2008 video by Rowan University [2] to produce far more calories than possible for the given hydrogen impregnation in a 50KW reactor. The hydrogen and catalyst are brought up to 200C at which point the reaction produces far more heat than Rowan chemists can account for with standard chemistry. Dr Mills controversial Grand Unified Theory [3] is based on a sub zero state hydrogen atom. This theory was challenged by Andre Rathke (May 2005) paper “A critical analysis of the hydrino model”. [4] however Rathke’s paper was itself soon challenged by Jan Naudts paper (5 August 2005). “On the hydrino state of the relativistic hydrogen atom” [5] which demonstrated that Rathke had not allowed for relativistic effects (temporal axis displacement). on May 27th 2008 Bernard Haisch and Garret Moddel were awarded a patent [6] for a device based on stochastic electrodynamics which also describes an orbital “spinning down” but leveraging the restricted vacuum fluctuations of a Casimir exclusion field their theory lends itself well to Naudts “relativistic” solution in place of the controversial sub zero state.
I am in agreement that a sub zero state of the hydrogen atom can not exist however the hydrino is very real and needs to be redefined as a positive temporal axis excursion. I am proposing that Jan Naudts mathematical evidence [5] of a “relativistic” solution side steps the sub zero state argument and fits well with Dr Mills assertions of a non radiative transition “away” from zero state. if we assume a positive excursion on the temporal axis, the orbital simply remains stationary relative to vector changes of the nucleus and its’ boundary volume that is being squeezed into redistributing itself fat on the temporal axis while correspondingly reducing its’ profile in our plane. The energy level, -13.6 eV remains unchanged when translating in and out of these exclusion fields unless these “fat” atoms form a covalent bond that locks their orbital configurations one against the other preventing the new molecule’s orbitals from translating back into our plane. It is these dihydrinos that provide an alternate explanation for Mills energy level data without violating the zero state or the spectral evidence of Kunze, H-J (2008). “On the spectroscopic measurements used to support the postulate of states with fractional principal quantum numbers in hydrogen” [7].

I am proposing a composite of Naudts-Moddel- Haisch theory be adopted for investigating hydrino like constructs without the burden of sub zero state arguments or spectral line conflicts.

My suggestion that these “temporally Fat” atoms must form a covalent bond is not necessary to adopting Naudts much more important idea that the hydrino is due to relativistic effect not sub zero state. The continuing arguments and papers since then still focus on the sub zero state argument apparently unaware of Naudts relativistic solution or simply missing its significance when applied to the 4D geometry of the orbital boundary. Naudts paper was a mathematical analysis which I believe has lead to the physical interpretation being overlooked.
My theory regarding covalent bonding to follow is totally independent of the hopefully adopted relativistic theory above. I propose that the orbital boundaries of the newly formed “fat” molecule formed inside an exclusion field are no longer free to redistribute volume between their 4D parameters while exiting the cavity. The new molecule’s orbitals are not free to transition back to our plane which causes normally chaotic virtual particles to accumulate organized boundary conditions trying to push the offending orbitals back into their normal “skinny” orientations in our plane. These boundary conditions quickly accumulate as the temporal dimension narrows inversely to plate spacing and break the covalent bond. This momentarily restores the atoms to monatomic levels which instantly re-bond releasing energy and more importantly again locking the orbital orientation to specific gradient on the time axis. This rearms and accelerates the process cascading down the time axis until the molecule is ejected from the cavity. This method turns a covalent bond into a bucket which extracts heat energy from “organized” virtual particles.
I predict that the covalent “temporally fat” molecule formed inside an exclusion field is capable of reacting with space-time. Vacuum fluctuations accumulate boundary conditions with orbitals as the molecule exits the exclusion field but their reactionary forces are translated 90 degrees to the time axis avoiding back pressure with hydrogen supply. These boundary potentials can be harvested as heat energy when the bond is broken such as the Black Light Power reactors tested by Rowan University however there is another as yet untested potential. The accumulated boundary conditions with vacuum fluctuations just prior to the breaking of the covalent bond while the molecule is exiting the exclusion field can be adapted for propellantless thrust. It is not yet established if the plasma producing molecule can be extracted without collapsing the boundary conditions so it may be necessary to move the entire medium containing the cavity to develop relative motion between Space-Time and the plasma. In the meantime however I predict that plasma reactors such as those employed by BLP are already producing exotic inertia properties unmeasured to date. I predict that a reactor approaching threshold of plasma production will exhibit resistance to motion in the gravitational axis due to boundary interleaving. This property is easily overlooked because motionless “interleaving” will only reveal a frictional contact in one axis. If I am correct then adding or subtracting calibrated weights will reveal the effect relative to a baseline measurement. The weights will eventually balance but much slower than baseline measurement due to dragging boundary conditions.
Although this paper only speaks to the specific case of one catalyst forming Casimir cavities it implies heavily that all catalytic action is powered by Casimir geometry be it cavities or surface outcroppings. I am proposing that mechanistic origin of catalysis is not as complex as present theory implies, reactants simply take “temporal” detours through this geometry to perform chemistry at normal speed from their perspective but greatly accelerated from our perspective. This fits well with the ageing effect associated with catalysts. This effectively accelerates time through a very narrow opening just like the opposite case of slowing time in the very wide opening of an event horizon – both effects only relative from our perspective.
see updates and animation

References
1. Black Light Power Inc. www.blacklightpower.com
2. Rowan University Confirmation Video http://www.blacklightpower.com/Documentary%20Video/blacklight_experiment_video_v2.wmv
3. Randell Mills “The Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics” http://www.blacklightpower.com/theory/theory.shtml
4. Andre Rathke (May 2005). “ A critical analysis of the hydrino model” New Journal of Physics 2005 http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1367-2630/7/1/127/
5. Jan Naudts (August 2005) “ On the hydrino state of relativistic hydrogen atom” http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0507193v2
6. Bernard Haisch and Garret Moddel patent US 7,379,286 B2 awarded May 27, 2008

http://www.calphysics.org/Patent7379286.pdf

7. Kunze, H-J (2008). “On the spectroscopic measurements used to support the postulate of states with fractional principal quantum numbers in hydrogen”. J Phys D: Appl Phys 41: 108001. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/41/10/108001 http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0022-3727/41/10/108001/