I had been following the work of Randell Mills for years. His company, Black Light Power, in nearby Cranburry NJ has been claiming a new form of chemistry based on a new state of hydrogen inside a catalyst. When the news of a confirmation of excess heat by Rowan University occured in the Fall of 2008 I immediately looked up the pore size of their skeletal catalyst Rayney nickel to see if it possibly met Casimir geometry. The pore sizes overlap the most active range for Casimir effect below 10 nm. This is in a range where stiction normally occurs making nano materials clump together and may play a roll when molten metals congeal or grow whiskers to alleviate this Casimir force.

This led me to develop an alternative theory for Casimir effect based on Naudts theory of relativistic hydrogen and Puthoff’s atomic model where vacuum fluctuations apply a counter pressure that opposes the decay of atomic orbitals. I extended Naudts suggestion of a relativistic solution for the fractional orbits reported by Mills, Miley and Arata under differnt monkiers – hydrino, deuterium clusters or inverted Rydberg. I propose that the anomalous heat associated with each of these researchers is due to an asymetrical translation of atomic vs diatomic gas entering and exiting these relativistic fields. A relativistic interpretation of Casimir effect produces gradients of inertial frames by reshaping vacuum fluctuations in space-time to appear shorter and fit between the Casimir boundaries, plates or cavities, in proportion to the sum of local geometry. The effect is known to dissipate upon nearfield proximity to the bounding walls so must start to sum at some minimal distance where changes in local geometry will cause the most abrupt changes in Casimir force and presumably the greatest catalytic action (smooth walled CNTs only exhibit catalytic action at openings and defects). My premise is that monatoms freely translate between these inertial frames but diatoms by nature of their bonds oppose this translation / reshaping of orbitals, effectively rectifying energy from normally chaotic motion according to gas law (based on uncertainty principle)to help disassociate fractional diatoms. This is also seen in the action of Pd membranes or PEM filters that prevent h2 from passing but allow protons to pass. If the protons reform h2 inside a similar structure where defects allow the formation then there will be opposition to further motion where the diatomic bond opposes any further reshaping of the atomic orbitals it is holding together. When the energy source pushing these molecules through the membrane is removed we hear these reports of “Life after death” where anomalous heat continues to be produced for hours and even days beyond power removal. I suggest gas law still provides the motion/energy to disassociate diatoms based on thermal distribution. Some small population of atoms will still be approaching disassociation temperature and be effectively “prearmed” to disassociate when changes in the local Casimir geometry/force exceeds the force exerted by a fractional diatomic bond in opposition to the force of gas law trying to randomly push it into a nearby but different inertial frame. These opposing forces break the diatomic bond and restores the fractional atoms to a fractional value appropriate for the new inertial frame. These atoms are now ready to reform a molecule and repeat the cycle between fractional h1 and fractional h2 as this accumulated population/cluster of fractional h2 slowly “melts” out of the cavity fractional states in a process reverse to when heat or pressure forced h1 deep into its moste fractional regions.

In early 2009 I discovered the patent by Haisch and Modell dated May 2008 which already cited Casimir effect as a prerequisite for a method of extracting energy from noble gases. This meant I was a day late and a dollar short regaring the role of Casimir effect and only my relativistic interpretation of Casimir effect remains a unique theory. The Haisch and Moddel patent was based on manufactured Casimir cavities in stacks of copper plates similar to the pores in the skeletal catalysts used by Mills but separated by insulating layers to maximize the orbital translations between plates. Their theory differs greatly from Black Light Power in that they do not require any chemical reactions. I mistakenly compared their extraction method ,which Dr Haisch coined “Casimir – Lamb Shift” to the Black Light Process in previous blogs but this was resolved in a recent reply to a Huffington Post article “ Sorry, it’s Malignant: Why Scientists Need a New Approach on Climate Change” when Professor Moddel stated “ Some bloggers have linked our patent to Blacklight Power’s hydrino. I cannot comment on whether the concept of a hydrino is valid, but the physics behind it is certainly different from the physics that supports our concept”. He also cited a paper he published in October 09 Assessment of proposed electromagnetic quantum vacuum energy extraction methods which very clearly defined for me the “Casimir Lamb shift”. According to this paper The Casimir – Lamb shift can extract energy from a single atom which releases energy locally to the cavity but then is restored globally by ZPE when it exits the cavity. It does not rely on any collisions or chemistry to occur while inside the cavity as I had wrongly presumed, it is a totally quantum effect. The Black Light Process meanwhile rejects any quantum contributions and is based solely on multibody collisions. My theory is more similar to that of Haisch and Modell which is based based on the Puthoff atomic model but also embraces the need for chemical reactions similar to the Black Light process and presumably the Miley and Arata methods employing Pd membranes in their design.

The different methods and materials used are all based on atomic gas and Casimir geometry . If there really are multiple ways to extract energy from this same environment then the data obtained should contain evidence of summing. The Haisch -Moddel patent describes energy derived from quantum forces without chemical reactions while BLP’s method is solely chemical and refuses to consider any quantum contributions like Casimir effect. My own solution combines them both where molecules formed from these shifted or fractional state atoms allow for ash less chemistry. The diatomic bond opposes further changes in these fractional states but Gas law forces the diatom to move. This changes the local Casimir force and disassociates the diatom so the atoms can translate to the new appropriate fractional value. This frees them to repeat the cycle for as long as they remain fractional.

This is a follow-up to a previous article Will 2010 be the year of Zero Point Energy? It focuses on the perceived differences between hydrino and fractional hydrogen and proposes that the two are equivalent. Our conclusion is that catalytic action is based on changes in Casimir force which requires the same relativistic interpretation that Jan Naudts proposed for the hydrino. The hydrino is just hydrogen that finds itself in a relativistic environment through “equivalence”. Casimir plates accumulate gravitational equivalence like any dense matter but having the unique property of venting a portion of this accumulation as a steady stream through the tiny cavity formed between the plates. The force of this stream is inversely proportional to the cube of the distance between the plates for non ideal metals.

The “hydrino” appears to violate the minimum ground state for a nonrelativistic atom because our understanding of catalytic action is incomplete. When Naudts proposed a relativistic solution which was proved by Bourgoin in 2006, it was embraced by Mills but he had no reason to update his papers or theory, The fault was not with his work. The fault is with our limited understanding of catalytic action. The math and metrics for catalysts puts everything in terms of energy and surface area which hides the relativistic nature of the effect. The US patent office denied Mills a patent based on his description using catalytic action and energy to describe “fractional states” but then turned around in May 2008 and granted a patent based on the same concepts to Haisch and Moddel describing it as Casimir effect and using Lorentzian math to describe a synthetic catalyst reacting with the same monatomic gas. “Relativistic” hydrogen was acceptable but “catalytic” hydrogen was not. There are still many researchers using catalytic action to describe this same exploitable environment. They often employ different methods to extract energy but it appears for now they must translate their work to describe Casimir effect and Lorentz transformations if they want to apply for a U.S. patent. Skeptics prefer to focus on the this current definition of catalytic action which is not based on a relativistic interpretation to dismiss Mills and any other researchers who suggest a fractional quantum state. These skeptics need to understand that relativistic hydrogen can exist in a stationary reactor through equivalence and that the Casimir effect can segregate normal equivalence to accelerate time in a tiny cavity. The plates still slow time in the more traditional understanding of gravitational equivalence but inside the tiny cavity time escapes the plates in a steady accelerated stream.

We know that relativistic muons are constantly streaming toward earth and that time dilation can accumulate for much lesser velocities such as stellar gases and micrometeorites in nearby space. These effects are all normally considered intangible since they exist in different inertial frames only briefly approaching our frame of observation. Science accepts “equivalent” acceleration due to gravitational fields and that time dilation accumulates exactly the same for “equivalent” acceleration even though the mass remains stationary. Lorentzian contraction also tells us that atoms achieving luminal velocities physically shrink such that they can pass through stationary openings many times smaller than their own dimensions. I am proposing that Lorentzian contraction also occurs with equivalent acceleration allowing more hydrogen gas to be stored inside a catalyst then the calculated volume would suggest. I propose that catalytic action is a result of equivalent acceleration due to Casimir geometry.

The real controversy with respect to the hydrino should be a over this posit of equivalent acceleration where time is accelerated instead of slowed. If we can accept the slowing of time from “equivalent” motion where a space craft parks on a large dense mass, then at a mesocopic scale ,we should also accept acceleration of time where the dense mass of conductive plates is amplified by alignment and geometry to ,again, slow time but only in the plate surface. the tiny cavity between these plates breaches the plate action and funnels the time flow forming a permanent exhaust stream many times faster than the nominal rate outside the cavity. This is not antigravity as Difiore et all discovered in 2001 that the effect can not be scaled. The opposition of Casimir plates to time flow immediately exhausts at their large external surfaces. The opposition only accumulates a gravitational “pressure” internal to the metal which a small cavity or tiny deffect in the lattice simply seeks to exhaust. Because these cavities are too small to exhaust the ever accumulating pressure a permanent venturi is established where the rate of time flow is accelerated and which we commonly refer to as Casimir force (changes in this force produce catalytic action). In both cases the mass under consideration is stationary but in one instance time flow is gradually slowed proportional to density and mass while, in the other instance, this same opposition is tapped to accelerate time.

The math used by Naudts and Bourgoin dictates a relativistic environment.”Cavity QED” by Zofia Bialynicka-Birula defines a Casimir cavity as a relativistic environment where the plates define an abrupt boundary that breaks the isotropy of space time. Present Casmir effect theory suggests larger virtual particles are displaced in favor of smaller particles but the relativistic interpretation is that these larger particles only appear smaller due to Lorentzian contraction.

Haisch and Modell designed a device with stacks of metal plates separated by insulating plates all drilled to form columns of Casimir cavities where hydrogen can be circulated through the entire block. This design also forces the atoms into and out of relativistic states due to the insulation layers. It avoids the stagnation that can occur in the pores of skeletal catalysts and uses a weaker .1u spacing (mechanical drilling limit) for Casimir geometry compared to average 10 nm spacing of pores in Mill’s skeletal catalyst. Their prototype is stalled awaiting funding but promises more methods of controlling the reaction and much better heat extraction then the “lump of coal” method employed for the Rowan University confirmations of Mills material.

We are proposing that Catalytic action is based on changes in Casimir effect and should be based on a relativistic interpretation of Casimir effect. This is supported by the papers from Naudts , Bourgoin and Bialynicka-Birula as well as
A recent article from Peng Chen@ Cornell indicates that catalytic action only occurs at openings and defects in a nanotube (therefore catalytic action can be defined as a “change” in Casimir force).

For decades researchers have often reported anomalous excess heat when atomic hydrogen and catalysts are involved. The mechanisms and therefore the ability to scale this effect have so far eluded scientists. Some research points to chemical byproducts and other research points to nuclear byproducts but both are insufficient to explain the amount of heat detected. This article proposes a plausible solution without byproducts pitting natures desire for the diatomic state against a “focused” catalytic/Casimir force that breaks this covalent bond by reshaping the atoms in opposition to it.( see this animation ). These forces are normally on different scales and require monatomic gas and a relativistic cavity where energy is suppressed to bring these scales into balance where they can oscillate. The difficulty is in keeping the balance to prevent runaway or starvation. Runaway will destroy the geometry producing Casimir effect while starvation doesn’t have enough heat to keep the gas monatomic.

In May 2008 Arata-Yang demonstrated the effect repeatedly using Pd and deuterium. Their experiment was recently replicated by Kitamura et all Phys. Lett. A, 2009. 273(35): p. 3109-3112. In the United States we have a patent granted in May 2008 to Haisch and Moddel for a system based on Casimir cavities and 2 Rowan university validations of the Black Light Process developed by Randell Mills, one in 2008 using reactors and materials supplied by Mills and more the second in August of 2009 a validation using only recipes from Mills while materials were procured commercially. All of these researchers appear to have different theories some of which are in direct conflict with established physics, hence Mills inability to patent a process that is clearly demonstrating excess heat while Haisch and Moddel were able to patent an as yet un-prototyped device using virtually the same physical concept but based on different physics. While the skeletal catalyst Rayney Nickel forms activated pores with geometry making them Casimir cavities the math and chemistry Mills submits to define the reaction is based on catalytic action and requires hydrogen to take on orbital states 2 to 137 times smaller than ground state. Haisch and Moddel rephrase the “hydrino” which violates the laws of physics to what they term a system for converting energy from electromagnetic quantum vacuum by suppressing appropriate frequencies by virtue of the Casimir effect which suppresses longer wavelength vacuum energy as the plates get closer. Mills definition could have been salvaged in 2005 when Jan Naudts proposed the 137 fractional states could be relativistic or even later when in 2007 Ron Bourgoin published a paper that actually proved the 137 fractional states using equations dictating a relativistic environment for electrons(occupying the same spatial position). Mills embraced the support but never redefined his theory or patent application allowing Haisch and Moddel to patent their similar theory unopposed.

I include LENR and the Casimir cavity based patent of Haisch and Moddel with the Black Light process claimed by Randell Mills because the catalyst pore sizes used by Mill’s and the surface geometry of SPAWAR electrodes are also of Casimir geometry. The Pd and Pd nanopowders used by Arata in Japan also form cavities between particles on their surface geometry and even inside the lattice defects where hydrogen is both absorbed and disassociated via the membrane properties of Pd. It is unlikely these different reports all involving monatomic gas and catalysts are unrelated. even sonoluminescence may be the result of conductive liquid meniscus rapidly compressing hydrogen gas pockets into Casimir geometry.

No theory yet explains how the conservation of energy is broken to produce excess heat, even if the hydrogen or deuterium translates to relativistic hydrogen inside a Casimir cavity the transition as noted by Mills is nonradiative, according to Mills a reaction is necessary inside the cavity but according to the H-M theory the hydrogen loses energy to the cavity walls even without a reaction but is then restored via the global vacuum energy as it exits the cavity. My point is that any energy differential should cause a back pressure to the hydrogen supply restricting the flow into the cavity equal to any potential energy gains. Here the Naudts proposal escapes conservation of energy because mechanical forces/t do not have to sum to zero between inertial frames if you break the symmetry by forming a covalent bond while the atoms are in a relativistic fractional state. e in * t/1 = e out * t /(2-137). Even with the Naudts theory this is not “free” energy, you exchange spatial units for temporal units when the covalent bond opposes changes in Casimir force (changes in catalytic action) meaning you exchange time for heat energy. A recent discovery by Peng Chen at Cornell University Finds nanotubes concentrate catalytic action at ends and at defects in the walls of nanotubes, This suggests changes in Casimir geometry would also concentrate catalytic action. Much of what we know about catalytic action is based on simple metrics, surface areas, oxidation and figures of merit. The relativistic interpretation of Casimir effect strongly suggests the engine behind catalytic action is based on changes in Casimir geometry.

Motion of dihydrinos between changing Casimir geometry breaks their covalent bonds as the atoms reshape to match the changing inertial frames. The claim that hydrogen translates to hydrino without photon emission tells us the atom is reshaped from our perspective by the lower vacuum energy inside the cavity. This reshaping can have 137 different values according to Bourgoins paper forming a gradient based on very local plate geometry and spacing. These “relativistic” atoms still must reshape even after forming a molecule but are opposed by the new covalent bond, the covalent bond eventually gets broken by this reshaping force when the molecule moves to a Casimir geometry/force sufficient to exceed the bonding force. This force restores the atoms to monatomic energy levels (qualifying the atoms to repeat the procedure). This reshaping force is proportional to the suppressed value of vacuum energy, inversely proportional to the cube of distance between the plates per Casimir force F(z) / S = -(pi^2 * reduced h * c) / (240* z^3) where reduced h is the reduced Planck constant, c is the velocity of light, and S is the area of the plates. It creates multiple inertial frames allowing molecular bonds to organize and exploit time dilation between frames. The balancing point however is difficult to maintain because nature immediately forces the atoms back to diatomic states which emits a photon and starts the cycle over again in what can become a destructive thermal runaway quickly melting the cavity to relieve the Casimir force and producing the hydride byproducts claimed by Black Light Power or going the other way, starving the process into the slow “life after death” scenario described by Arata and others where a slow excess heat is recorded after the experiment is de-energized and lasting days to weeks depending on the size and geometry of nano powders and loading methods. In the animation note hydrogen on top with normal (red) emission on bonding while moving plates show relativistic atoms translated and spectrum shifted (blue). At bottom an exaggerated multiple vacuum fluctuation is shown twisting with time dilation to appear faster from our perspective vs being displaced by shorter fluctuations per current theory.

Another reason I am tolerant of the hydride byproducts and lack of dihydrinos available for analysis is the very short duration of the BLP reaction. It screams thermal runaway and the byproducts would only account for the destructive reactions necessary to relieve the Casimir force by melting closed or shorting the parallel plates. In my theory there is no byproduct -nature oscillates between the desired diatomic state and molecular disassociation when the new high mobility molecule finds its covalent bond opposed by the individual atoms still trying to transition to different fractional states(relativistic). What is needed is a control loop to keep the frequency slow enough to extract the heat before damage can occur. The fact that other reports of excess heat like Arata in Japan evolve over days or weeks suggests the opposite condition of starvation where oscillation is delayed over time as the atomic gas slowly accumulates the velocities needed to exchange time dilation for energy. Kitamura’s replication of Arata experiment indicates the effect becomes more pronounced with fineness of the nanopowders.

The application of Naudts relativistic proposal to the Casimir effect is often met with skepticism, At the macro scale time dilation requires velocities at high fractions of C or crushing gravitational wells that provide equivalent acceleration of similar effect. These effects are concentrating our interaction with virtual particles. We also know linear luminal velocity would be impossible to attain in a Casimir cavity so I have assumed equivalent deceleration vs equivalent acceleration. It is the differences in vacuum energy suppression inside the cavity vs outside that we are trying to use atomic hydrogen to exploit. The energy is considered negative but we are only concerned with the absolute differential value.

From the Puthoff atomic model I conjecture an energy “pressure” that keeps an orbital in a balanced ground state –hence “my river of time”/virtual particles pressing past our nuclei and growing larger as they flash past our electrons in the final scene of my animation. I want to springboard from this concept to an XY axis of velocity vs. time where as v approaches C an animated spacecraft slows it’s progress along the x axis and starts to rise and contract on the y axis – all with the virtual particle background from above animation playing at 20% alpha illumination to make the point the ships velocity relative to the moving field has a Pythagorean component that becomes more pronounced as matter starts to reach velocities of similar magnitude to the virtual particles. I hesitate to say these virtual particles have a luminal velocity since their “rate” may well establish the relativistic values upon which we measure “time”. that said these virtual particles still must obey certain rules and not occupy already existing space causing a “pressure” differential that agrees with Puthoff’s atomic model, I believe this “pressure” causes a vortex around and behind the nucleus (from a 4D perspective) that restores the orbital energy after spontaneous emission and keeps a balanced ground state. This “standard” pressure of time passing from future to past through matter is what I believe Casimir cavities are able to “segregate”. It is not just like a tiny cavity of dead air like you imagine with insulation materials. I believe the plate geometry of conductors concentrate a resistance to this flow like the canvas sails of a sailing ship where a small hole (cavity) creates a relief where the concentrated wind pressure forms a venturi where the speed and pressure is far removed from the nominal wind speed. It is this difference between the nominal value of time and the venturi induced values inside the cavity that we can exploit with atomic hydrogen.

In the same paradox manner that accelerating matter in 3D space slows time from our perspective, accelerating the flow of virtual particles through a cavity accelerates time from our perspective and lowers the energy “pressure” inside the cavity. The difference between our inertial frame energy and these decelerated frames inside the cavity is often referred to as negative energy, It suggests a gravity hill as opposed to the deep gravity well in the twin paradox where the space faring twin can park on a high G object to accumulate time dilation, instead the shielded (decelerated) cavity equates to the earthbound twin and hydrogen outside the cavity equates to the “high G” twin. One should not focus on the difference between planetary gravity vs free space which would NOT account for the effect, rather we consider the “nominal rate” at which virtual particles pass through 3D space which is amplified by this “venturi like” property of a Casimir cavity. The force is described by the Casimir formula and is proportional to the fractional relativistic states Bourgoin calculated for the hydrino multiplied by some scaling constant for atomic hydrogen and another constant for molecular hydrogen. This sets up the asymmetry for energy gain when the translation is atomic in one direction but molecular in the other.
Recalll the 2 conditions from animation…
H+H>> H2 + photon and remains H2 end of story
while in the Casimir cavity
H/x+H/x >> (H2)/x + photon but then changes in Casimir force
break the covalent bond restoring atoms at new levels H/(x+dx)
therefore the relationship between Casimir force and orbitals is different for atoms and molecules.
Casimir force F(z) / S = -(pi^2 * reduced h * c) / (240* z^3)
multiplied by the appropriate scaling factor should be equal to the fractional state depicted in Bourgoins equation below

In the normal scenario this relationship simply prevents H2 from
diffusing into the smaller geometry of a Casimir cavity but when energy is invested to keep hydrogen atoms disassociated and Casimir cavities are present the criteria for producing fractional states are met, any atoms diffusing into the suppression zones become fractional and have the potential for rectifying the difference in energy between the normal and suppression zones but only if they
form a covalent bond to oppose the reverse translation and force the change in suppression to break the covalent bond thereby restoring atomic energy levels.

Kitamura, A., et al., Anomalous effects in charging of Pd powders with high density hydrogen isotopes. Phys. Lett. A, 2009. 273(35): p. 3109-3112. http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/KitamuraAanomalouse.pdf

Their conclusion that the D(H)/Pd ratio and absorption energy is an increasing function of fineness of the sample surface seems undeniable based on their calibrations and differential measurements as documented in their report. It confirms many of the earlier reports by other researchers such as Arata of excess heat in nano Pd material and lends support to anomalous heat reported in similar materials with fineness on the scale of Casimir geometry such as the skeletal catalyst Rayney Nickel used by Dr Mills of Black Light Power.
Research by Kitamura et al finally provides us a quanative values for an entire table of Pd materials with different granularities and conditions. They report deuterium/hydrogen absorption and accompanying heat generation which shows anomalously large isotope effect. What they refer to as anomalously large isotope effect may be what Arata /Zhang calls “pycnodeuterium”, or what Mills is calling a “hydrino” and what others are calling fractional state hydrogen or relativistic hydrogen.

Researchers should keep an open mind toward the suggestion of Jan Naudts that fractional hydrogen is relativistic. This would mean LENR and the Black Light process are related and but you will never ever see the hydrino outside the pores of a rgidid catalyst /casimir cavity. Skeptics that point at the hydride byproducts of the Black Light process as being impracticable must realize byproducts only represent the “destructive” ash as thermal runaway starts causing reactions with the cavity wall to nullify the Casimir force,The real actors in this play produce no byproduct!They are just gas atoms experiencing equivalent acceleration due to Casimir effect. There is a window where nature’s desire for diatomic states is balanced against high mobility atoms in a rigid cavity allowing them to oscillate between bonded and unbonded states with change in plate spacing.The equivalent acceleration would also explain the spectrum shift reported for the Black light plasma. see animation http://byzipp.com/energy/

When someone finally produces a 100W closed loop reactor to prove the energy is there and attainable it will not reduce the controversey. Mills and Arata are not the only ones reporting excess heat or putting forth a theory to explain it. Haisch and Moddel received a patent based on Casimir cavities which just also happen to be what you get when Al is leached out of Nickel to form the skeletal catalyst Rayney nickel used by Mills. the truth is the method is still a mystery and many competing theories abound. A closed loop system will cause the funding issue to finally disappear and an intellectual property race the likes of which you have never seen before will ensue. Mills has no patent because he locked himself into the impossible claim of a fractional ground state.

I propose to marry the Haisch – Moddel Casimir cavity based theory with work by Jan Naudts and Ron Bourgoin that proposes a relativistic solution for the “hydrino”. Their papers dictate a relativistic environment using equations assuming electrons can occupy the same spatial positions – a condition that presupposes time dilation. Since hydrogen is spatially confined inside the Casimir cavity this relativistic acceleration must occur through equivalence, Unlike a deep gravity well formed by concentrated mass the Casimir cavity represents an abrupt equivalence boundary where the ambient gravitational field becomes segregated -concentrating in the plate surface and depleted in the cavity. The summation of the vacuum fluctuations in the depleted zone is a lower energy zone than the ambient level meaning any atoms diffused there become decelerated or from their perspective, We outside the cavity are accelerating away from them much like the space bound twin in the twin paradox. Unlike the twin paradox we have spatial confinement keeping the cavity and contents spatialy stationary with an equivalent acceleration vector on the time axis. We appear to slow down to them or they appear to accelerate relative to us. I predict this effect is related to catalytic action but in the case of a rigid skeletal catalyst with appropriate atomic gas can be exploited to trade time dilation for heat energy.

The energy source is the Casimir plates, the static field would seem unexploitable but the relativistic proposal provides multiple inertial frames allowing us to unbalance the symetrical non radiative transitions of hydrogen into and out of a Casimir field. If the hydrino forms a dihydrino the constituent atoms still try to transition further with changes in plate spacing but are now opposed by the covalent bond. The difference in energy levels normally associated with time dilation are instead used to break the covalent bond -in effect trading time for energy. This “reaction” has no byproduct and represents a fine balancing act which can turn into thermal runaway cascade where the oscillation between diatomic and monatomic overheats the cavity molten and geometry reshapes to relieve the field (think Mills 50kw quick burn out ) or the heat build up is very slow and gradual (think Arata and other reports of “heat after death”)
-just my hunch
Fran http://www.byzipp.com/hydrino/

The Hydrino was dismissed by mainstream physicists because it was defined as having orbital states lower than ground state. Jan Naudts later published a paper “On the hydrino state of the relativistic hydrogen atom” that proposed the hydrino could be a relativistic anomally but it wasn’t until 2007 that Ron Bougoin published “Inverse Quantum Mechanics of the Hydrogen Atom” that showed the general wave equation solved for the 137 inverse principal quantum states indicated by Mills. Both authors used math normally reserved for photons dictating a relativistic perspective when applied to electrons. In a related paper Bourgoin solved for orbital velocity as C/n where 1< n <137. The equations he used dictate this velocity is only apparent from a relativistic perspective outside the cavity and can only be applied to electrons when in different inertial frames. the orbital velocity remains unchanged locally inside the same inertial frame. The relativistic interpretation is based on “Cavity QED” by Zofia Bialynicka-Birula which proposes that Casimir cavities break gravitational isotropy forming an abrupt equivalence boundary between Casimir plates. The classical “displacement” of longer “slower” wavelength vacuum flux in between Casimir plates can be re-interpreted as a change in inertial frames simply making them appear faster or shorter. (see animation virtual particle vs. depiction changed wavelength). This puts a relativistic twist on the QED theory of “up conversion” of vacuum flux frequency due to Casimir effect. the gas atoms inside vs outside a Casimir cavity appear contracted and their clocks appear slower relative to each other. The observer in the faster gravitational field outside the cavity ages slower than the “shielded ” hydrogen dragging behind in the slower gravitational field inside the cavity. the hydrogen diffused inside a Casimir cavity experiences an “equivalent de-acceleration” the reverse of an ” equivalent acceleration” a spaceship would experience in a deep gravity well relative to a remote observer. The cavity keeps the hydrogen inside essentially stationary relative to outside the cavity but the plates partially shield the gravitational field falling outside from the inside. This means the small difference in acceleration is “equivalent” acceleration and accumulates velocity on the time axis. This interpertation may also be suggesting something about the true nature of catalytic action. Although the “depletion” zone in a cavity appears to accelerate reactions the suppression of spontaneous emission inside a microwave cavity suggests that microwave energy can also accomplish segregation of “concentration” and “depletion” zones but un the case of suppression the orbital would need to react with “concentration” zones to account for the delay.

The classic interpertation of Casimir cavity is described as a restriction of longer wavelength vacuum fluctuations which are replaced with shorter wavelengths that can fit between the plates in a whole number of multiples. A relativistic interpretation however is that space-time curves allowing the longer wavelengths to appear shorter from our perspective outside the cavity. This “less” curved space places any atoms diffusing through the region into a different inertial frame and it expriences an “equivalent” change in acceleration complements of the Casimir effect. The differential rate between the internal and external frames allows the external world to steadily accumulate velocity away from the trapped atoms in the cavity but because the cavity walls keep the contents spatially stationary relative to the external world the difference in velocity may account for the anomalous heat and time dilation. I propose when compounds form at high velocity the opposition to the confinement increases for diatomic compounds and if cavity geometry is properly selected for this quality like Rayney Nickel it can act like a membrane. This would still harvest a photon and then restore the atoms to monatomic energy levels by sacrificing some of the accumulated velocity. The odd vector of the accumulated velocity also escapes the normal mechanical linkage back to our space outside the cavity through displacement in time. Atoms are pushed sidewise in time instead of in a spatial direction effectively trading time for energy and avoiding the expected back pressure of circulating gas through these cavities – instead we produce “much older” hydrogen and excess heat when the molecules are immediately torn apart by a rigid cavity. The hydrogen is free to re-accumulate velocity and oscillate between H1 and H2 powered by this break in isotropy.

A little history, On August 12th 2009 BlackLight Power, Inc. (BLP) announced that scientists at Rowan University independently formulated and tested fuels that on demand generated energy greater than that of combustion at power levels of kilowatts using BLP’s proprietary solid-fuel chemistry. Rowan University professors have reported a net energy gain of up to 6.5 times the maximum energy potential of the materials in the system from known chemical reactions. Unlike previous validations in the fall of 2008 using powder provided by Black Light Power this was accomplished using off the shelf chemicals with only a recipe provided by Black Light Power. In both cases the energy produced exceeded known chemistry but using off the shelf chemicals quiets much of the speculation regarding some overlooked energy source in the method of preparation. This is not to say I agree with BLP theory which I do not and most certainly do not accept the fractional state hydrino but rather present their results as a recent example of excess heat. Other reports include Arata in Japan, Energetics in Israel and SPAWARS in California. This whole subject of anomalous heat production regarding monatomic hydrogen and different catalysts has been a long standing mystery in the scientific community. From Irving Langmuir’s circa 1939 Nobel Prize work with Atomic Hydrogen to Ponds and Fleischman work in the 80′s and a bevy of recent reports all around the world. Trying to unravel this mystery has taken many paths, Cold Fusion, bubble fusion, LENR, cavitations and Casimir cavities to name a few. Much of the controversy has revolved around claims of a fractional quantum state where the orbital radius drops below the Bohr radius. I am proposing these so called fractional quantum states or hydrino states as defined by BLP are not real but rather relativistic and can only be observed from outside an equivalence boundary like a Casimir cavity. Atoms inside the cavity remain unchanged relative to each other in the same manner that the model Twin Paradox of physics allows the twin approaching C or an event horizon to remain unchanged relative to his own frame nothing happens.

A little theory, Casimir plates are inherent in a rigid catalyst and create a “depletion zone” where a whole number value of longer wavelength vacuum fluctuations cannot fit between the plates. These wavelengths are thought to “up convert” to shorter wavelengths according to QED theory although, from a relativistic perspective of up conversion one might say the vacuum fluctuation simply de-accelerates relative to the gravitational field outside the cavity and therefore only “appears” faster from our perspective (space-time “unstretches” inside the cavity vs. outside). the wavelength
“turns” on the time axis presenting a faster smaller profile from our perspective -see animation The theory that space inside a Casimir cavity has equivalent acceleration ( actually “de-acceleration” is more appropriate compared to ambient gravity field outside the cavity) was first proposed by Di Fiore et all in a 2002 paper “Vacuum fluctuation force on a rigid Casimir cavity in a gravitational field“. They proposed the possibility of verifying the equivalence principle for the zero-point energy of quantum electrodynamics, by evaluating the force, produced by vacuum fluctuations, acting on a rigid Casimir cavity in a weak gravitational field. Their calculations show a resulting force has opposite direction with respect to the gravitational acceleration, their calculations indicates an equivalent acceleration between the gravitational fields “falling “outside the cavity relative to inside the cavity. This force of only 10 E^-14 N appears inconsequential but it is a constant acceleration which accumulates into frame divergence. I prefer to call this de-acceleration because the isotropy is broken by a Casimir shielding effect that leaves the depletion zone dragging behind the “faster falling” external gravitational field. Hydrogen atoms inside these inertial fields are locally unaware of any change but from our perspective outside the cavity appear smaller and faster accounting for the relativistic nature of the Hydrino.

Black Light Power’s definition of the “hydrino” and other “fractional quantum state hydrogen” definitions are wrong. Here Mills’ should be commended for excellent technical skill in capturing valuable data and improving the output despite a seriously flawed theory. Not that his mistake is surprising since DiFiore et all did not introduce the idea of a Casimir cavity until 2002 the obvious assumption to explain the increased energy had to be a change in the orbital diameter since Planks constant and time were the only other variables involved and there was no reason to suspect a relativistic effects at the time! Mills had to work without the 2002 paper by the Italian researchers proposing the Casimir cavity as a source of equivalent acceleration and it wasn’t until 2005 the term “relativistic hydrogen” was proposed in a paper by Jan Naudts“ On the hydrino state of relativistic hydrogen atom” . This is a much more appropriate term sometimes called “fast” hydrogen which should be applied. Naudts calculations showed that detractors of Mills’ hydrino and other fractional quantum theories had overlooked relativistic effects inside a Casimir cavity. Naudts should have been clearer in conveying that relativistic hydrogen is not the fractional quantum hydrino as defined by Mills – the orbital radius never drops below ground state. Naudts equations did show that at least one stable state could be explained relativistically but was orders of magnitude too high for the 137 fractional states implied by data from BLP and, more importantly, it established the relativistic link. Two years later Ron Bourgoin released a paper “Inverse Quantum Mechanics of the Hydrogen Atom” that showed the general wave equation predicts exactly the 137 inverse principal quantum states claimed by BLP using Warkowski 4D co-ordinates. Both Naudts and Bourgoin used equations normally reserved for photons and skeptics argued that 1/2 spin electrons cannot occupy the same space and state and that the fractional states would simply fall away if the appropriate Dirac equations were used! A 1996 paper “Cavity QED* ” by Zofia Bialynicka-Birula addresses this with the destruction of isotropy inside a cavity and resulting effect on invariance under transformations of the Poincare group which I believe supports the equation selection by Naudts and Bourgoin and also establishes the relativistic nature of their solutions. I would state this as math performed from a relativistic perspective allows electrons to occupy what only appear to be the same spatial coordinates and states from an external perspective due to hydrogen populations at different acceleration rates but spatially near stationary, a back door way to extend the use of spin 1 equations when dealing with diverging inertial frames.

The frequent criticism regarding the stability of a fractional state hydrino is moot because the Hydrino doesn’t exist. “Relativistic” hydrogen is what Dr Mills mistook for fractional quantum states. Deiform et all proposed that the inside of a rigid Casimir cavity is a source of equivalent acceleration all the way back in 2002. So it is their calculated 10E-14 newtons of force which accumulates between the “more stationary” hydrogen atoms inside the cavity relative to the faster falling gravitational field outside the cavity (As Zofia stated the isotropy is broken by the Casimir cavity). This has the unlikely result of spatially confined hydrogen inside a cavity exhibiting Lorentz contraction and time dilation to an observer outside the plates without astronomical distances or deep gravitational wells. In fact it represents a gravitational “hill” due to depletion rather than the more familiar concentration effect of gravity “well”.

A Casimir depletion zone drags behind the exterior gravitational field to produce a differential force opposite the direction of the external gravity field. The velocity attained by hydrogen atoms in this spatially confined field is concentrated on the time axis and result in the divergence of time co-ordinates in the Warkowski space-time system. Although the 10E-14 N force seems inconsequential it only reflects the opening of the temporal confinement which heat and gas law energy can now contribute to further diverge the frame on the time axis. I am interpreting the Casimir cavity as a depletion zone where the isotropy of the gravity field is broken and the restriction of longer wavelength vacuum fluctuations reduces the more gravitationally active flux below 2 THZ as proposed by Christian Beck and Michael Mackey. Their papers, “Measureability of vacuum fluctuations and dark energy” and “Electromagnetic dark energy” propose virtual photons with frequency less than 2 THz are more gravitationally active than those above. Their claims are presently only theoretical awaiting experimental evidence to prove slower virtual photons are more gravitationally active. I infer from their work the ratio of short to long vacuum flux increases with mass so the time dilation in a depletion zone is opposite to a gravity well meaning the hydrogen inside a relativistic cavity will speed up instead of slow down further increasing the rate of frame divergence. It seems to act very much like catalytic action and could be the underlying mechanism behind all the columbic barrier and oxidation surface theory presently used to describe a catalyst.

Locally inside the cavity hydrogen remains just hydrogen and the Bohr radius is never violated. The acceleration inside the Cavity is at a different relative angle to time which accumulates into time dilation and Lorentz contraction which, as previously mentioned, looks suspiciously like what we more commonly refer to as catalytic action. With the appropriate choice of rigid catalyst (Rayney nickel or Pd) this “catalytic action” can be leveraged into producing excess heat. The acceleration and attained velocity of relativistic H1 inside the cavity opposes the confinement of Pd or Rayney Nickel when it forms relativistic H2 and is immediately broken apart restoring monatomic energy levels. nonrelativistic H2 remains confined by the geometry of the cavity unless disassociated such as BLP’s use of a tungsten filament in a reactor with their Rayney Nickel powder.

N =1 is assumed to be 45 degree for flat space sharing dimensions equally. As Velocity increases toward C on spatial axis XYZ time is suppressed (event horizon), As velocity increases toward C on time axis the spatial axis XYZ are suppressed (Casimir cavity).

If relativistic H1 forms relativistic H2 it is also denied mobility just like hydrogen molecules near the mouth of the cavity that were unable to diffuse into the depletion zone. The relativistic H2 however has accumulated velocity, is still in a frame with a different acceleration rate and is subject to gas law – heat still trying to diffuse the molecule in opposition to this confinement. The vacuum fluctuations of this still diverging relativistic frame build “organized” boundary conditions with the covalent bond of the confined molecule which breaks the bond and restores the atoms to monatomic levels using ZPE. You could also say the energy is provided by gas law for those opposed to ZPE :_)

When relativistic H2 forms inside a cavity it emits a photon and becomes more spatially confined in opposition to the high velocity of the relativistic H2. relativistic H2 and normal H2 both resist mobility when the appropriate geometry rigid Casimir cavity is selected but the relativistic H2 however has already attained high velocity in opposition to this confinement. This opposition immediately tears apart the ionic or covalent bond of the compound and restores the atoms to monatomic energy levels still at significant velocity. These relativistic H1 atoms are free to repeat the procedure again and again while emitting photons to further heat the cavity and restore some of the lost “temporal” velocity while not even combusting the hydrogen, the energy is supplied by a gravitational difference creating a temporal vector that allows a trigonmetric exchange between space and time. The product is excess heat and very “old” hydrogen.. see animation

A patent US 7,379,286 B2awarded May 27, 2008 to Bernard Haisch and Garret Moddel leverages Casimir force which they refer to as Casimir -Lamb shift. Their planned prototype of Casimir columns formed by milled columns through metallic plates separated by insulation layers are arranged in a stack. They drill an array of .1 micron columns through the stack which unlike Rayney nickel has a feed through path separated by insulators that force the depletion zones in each plate of each column to translate through its full range of values which is a vast improvement over the skeletal catalyst used by Mills. A recent discovery by Peng Chen at Cornell University Finds nanotubes only have catalytic action at ends and at defects where plate spacing changes. This indicates The Haisch – Moddel cavity columns with insulation breaks is superior to skeletal catalysts used by Mills. Although the skeletal catalyst has stronger depletion fields due to much smaller geometry the Rowan validations appear to release a burst of energy and then the Mills reactors are finished while the Haisch – Moddel model is designed to run continuously. Their .1u diameter cavities are much weaker, form columns that allow circulation control and mixing ratios of diatomic to monatomic gases and simpler heat exchange. Although the methods of confinement and the physics being exploited differ they both require the Casimir cavity to establish a differential zone where normal reactionary forces are partially suspended allowing what appears to be over unity but is actually rectifying energy from the ZPF.

Lorentz multiplier for Quantum states
by Francis X Roarty
Abstract

Fractional quantum states remain controversial and might be better labeled as Lorentz contraction multipliers. The calculation of fractional state quantum numbers is misleading because the Bohr radius is never violated and the values only represent the trigonometric portions of the Bohr radius visible from a different time frame. The actual measurement between different physical frames and therefore the fractional state hydrino is only a mathematical constuct allowing a calculated measureme of perspective not a real physical measurement. The twin paradox is the typical example where different world lines experience different orientations to space and time. The twin approaching C on the spatial –X- axis also approaches 0 to the time –Y- axis. The atoms of either twin are locally unchanged yet both appear contracted relative to each other due to displacement on the time axis, or Lorentz contraction. The difference in acceleration rates between twins is also an acceleration rate and therefore the divergence accumulates into time dilation. The Twin paradox requires astronomical distances and high acceleration but Italian researchers have proposed that Casimir cavities can also produce acceleration through equivalence in a method opposite to an event horizon; instead of concentrating gravitational force the Casimir cavity creates a depletion zone. Instead of accelerating on the spatial axis and reducing the time coordinate (slowing time relative to us), the cavity reduces acceleration on the spatial axis by bending space –time in the opposite direction toward the time axis (accelerating time relative to us).

Introduction
In 2005 a paper by Jan Naudts [1]“On the hydrino state of relativistic hydrogen atom” contends that the fractional quantum state argument overlooks relativistic solutions. Naudts use of the Klein Gordon equations is consistent with recent theories proposing the ZPF as a BEC. In 2007 Ronald Bourgoin published a paper,[2] “INVERSE QUANTUM STATES OF HYDROGEN”, that showed the general wave equation allows exactly for 137 inverse principal quantum levels. I am proposing these fractional solutions represent only trigonometric portions of the Bohr radius which remains constant but reoriented due to change in the temporal coordinate. This would confirm a relativistic solution as suggested by Naudts and imply the fractional values are actually due to Lorentz contraction.
The theory that Casimir cavities represent an abrupt equivalence boundary was introduced by Italian researchers Di Fiore et all in a 2002 paper,[3] “Vacuum fluctuation force on a rigid Casimir cavity in a gravitational field”. They discuss the possibility of verifying the equivalence principle for the zero-point energy of quantum electrodynamics, by evaluating the force, produced by vacuum fluctuations, acting on a rigid Casimir cavity in a weak gravitational field. Their calculations resolve a tiny force with opposite direction to the gravitational acceleration. Their proposal suggests a tiny but constant equivalent acceleration between the inside and outside of the cavity. This force would be graduated as the cavity geometry narrows.
Black Light Power has made claims of the existence of a hydrogen atom where the single electron resides in a fractional quantum state they call hydrino. The transition to such a state is induced by the presence of a catalyst and atomic hydrogen. Their skeletal catalyst Rayney nickel is by definition a Casimir cavity as defined by the geometry of its pore size. These lower fractional states are in agreement with a relativistic solution made possible through equivalence inside a Casimir cavity as suggested by Di Fiore et all and papers from Naudts and Bourgoin calculating the orbital from a relativistic perspective.

Bohr radius/C = propagation time = 17.7 E-18 seconds.
Bohr radius Sphere = 4/3 pi r^3 = 6.20E-31 meters ^3
VOLUME x TIME = CONSTANT PRODUCT
When volume is min 1/137 the time is a max 17.7 E-18
6.20E-31/137 meters^3 * 17.7 E-18 s = 8.01E-52 m^3s
When volume is max the time is a min 17.7 E-18/137
6.20E-31 meters^3 * 17.7 E-18/137 s = 8.01E-52 m^3s

I set N =1 at 45 degree for flat space where orbital is assumed to share space time dimensions equally.
As Velocity increases toward C on spatial axis, time axis is suppressed (event horizon).
As velocity increases toward C on time axis, the spatial axis is suppressed (Casimir cavity).

1. Jan Naudts (August 2005) “ On the hydrino state of relativistic hydrogen atom” http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0507193v2
2. Bourgoin, Ronald C (2007). “INVERSE QUANTUM STATES OF HYDROGEN”. The International Society for Condensed Matter Nuclear Science_ http://www.iscmns.org/asti06/Bourgoin%20RECIPROCAL%20QUANTUM%20STATES.pdf
3. Di Fiore, et all (14 May 2002 ). Vacuum fluctuation force on a rigid Casimir cavity in a gravitational field. from http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0109091

website http://www.byzipp.com/energy/excessHeat.htm

Randell Mills, founder of Black Light Power, claims a fractional quantum state of hydrogen he coins the “hydrino” which is formed inside skeletal catalyst Rayney nickel and has up to 137 fractional quantum states. The hydrino is claimed to produce much more heat energy than chemistry can explain inside the pores / cavities of the catalyst. The output energy was validated twice by Rowan University, most recently on August 12 th using off the shelf materials instead of materials prepared by Black Light Power. This establishes an easier path to replication and additional replications should be expected to follow. The theory however is still fiercely disputed and mainstream scientists continue to propose alternate solutions such as a Casimir-Lamb shift proposed by Haisch -Moddel from the perspective of Casimir cavities.

In 2005 a math paper by Jan Naudts contends that fractional quantum state argument against hydrino state overlooks relativistic solutions. This bolsters claim by Randell Mills that disassociated hydrogen diffused into skeletal catalyst can release excess heat. I will attempt to make the case that similar to the “Twin Paradox” in Physics 101. Hydrogen outside the cavity has equivalent motion relative to the shielded hydrogen inside the cavity. This results in hydrogen exiting the cavity older than hydrogen which did not diffuse through the cavity. Hydrogen inside the cavity performs many more reactions through time dilation and Lorentz contraction then could be performed outside the cavity for the time period the hydrogen was inside.

In 2007 Ronald Bourgoin published a paper that showed the general wave equation predicts exactly the 137 inverse principal quantum levels claimed by Mills. Bourgoins’s equations use a 4D coordinate system suggesting the orbital could appear to collapse spatially below the Bohr radius because the “displacement” to the nucleus is partially converted to the time axis. The fractional quantum radius only exists from our 3D perspective outside the cavity observing the hydrino inside. The Bourgoin solutions suggest Mills hydrino only exists relative to an observer outside the Casimir cavity. Inside the cavity hydrogen atoms are unaware the t coordinate of their (X, Y, Z, t) position has changed in the same way that the earth bound twin is unaware of his multiple second per second existence relative to the twin approaching an event horizon (C through equivalence). Only when the still young twin returns to earth or the now “old” hydrogen exits the cavity is the difference apparent.

The theory that Casimir cavities represent an abrupt equivalence boundary is not new, In 2002 a paper “Vacuum fluctuation force on a rigid Casimir cavity in a gravitational field” by Italian researchers Enrico Calloni, Luciano Di Fiore, Giampiero Esposito, Leopoldo Milano, Luigi Rosa discusses the possibility of verifying the equivalence principle for the zero-point energy of quantum electrodynamics, by evaluating the force, produced by vacuum fluctuations, acting on a rigid Casimir cavity in a weak gravitational field. The resulting force has opposite direction with respect to the gravitational acceleration, Their proposal indicates equivalent acceleration outside the cavity relative to inside the cavity. Although the force levels they mention , 10^-17N, seems inconsequential it results in a constant acceleration just like an ion drive which can eventually produce huge velocities, It also allows for the force to increase exponentially as fractional quantum states contract the atom to down to permeate increasingly smaller geometry, In fact most current investigations of hydrino, LENR and Casimir – Lamb shift effects all confirm the need for monatomic hydrogen.
The differential between inside and outside the cavity creates the relativistic perception of frequency up conversion. From the perspective of the Beck – Mackey work, the ratio of fast to slow virtual photons appears to increase and has fewer gravitationally active virtual photons. One could also simply consider this duty factor -if time inside the cavity executes at multiple seconds per second from our perspective then the earths gravity at 9.8m/s^2 is divided down by the same factor.

A paper by Thomas Prevenslik explaining Casimir effect instead through QED “up-conversion” does not require vacuum fluctuations, this method simply requires nature to up convert IR >> VUV per conservation of energy and plates are pulled together through induced electrostatic force. My relativistic theory combines his frequency “up conversion” with the rigid cavity properties proposed by the Italian research team in the preceding paragraph to allow equivalent acceleration between the outside and inside of the cavity. This means ALL Frequencies inside the cavity APPEAR up converted through time dilation. This includes the 2Thz virtual photons Beck and Mackey proposes to be more gravitationally active. The entire spectrum inside the “shielded” cavity “ages” at multiple seconds per second relative to the equivalent acceleration outside the cavity. I call this “relative” up conversion because the observer inside the cavity sees outside the cavity in the same manner we observe an event horizon.

Christian Beck and Michael Mackey publish papers, “Measurability of vacuum fluctuations and dark energy” and “Electromagnetic dark energy” revealing virtual photons with frequency less than 2 THz are more gravitationally active than those above. Beck’s claim is presently only theoretical awaiting experimental evidence. My proposal that the ratio of fast to slow virtual photons decreases down a gravity well hinges heavily on the results of Beck’s experiment proving slower virtual photons are more gravitationally active. This would establish my premise that the ratio of fast to slow virtual photons increases in a Casimir cavity as reflected by “up conversion” creating a small “gravity hill”

I propose the ratio of virtual photons ( >2 THz) / ( <2 THz) decreases approaching an event horizon to reflect Beck’s theory that slower virtual photons are more gravitationally active. The “up-conversion” in a Casimir cavity if relativistic would up convert all frequencies including virtual photons from our perspective outside the cavity, but the increased ratio of fast to slow virtual photons is now in the opposite direction creating a gravity “Hill” or lack of gravitationally active virtual photons as opposed to a gravity “Well”. This effect would be Omni directional in normal matter and quickly average out but in Casimir plates is directional and sums to create very local differentials where the shielded areas can be concentrated between two plates. These gravitational hills then see the normal space outside the cavity as down hill from their perspective just as we see an event horizon. The stage is now set for equivalence without the astronomical distances or crushing gravity of an event horizon. Although flat space doesn’t have the resistance to time flow of an event horizon it does still have a certain default fraction thereof, the shielded hydrogen inside the cavity however only experiences a small fraction of this default value based on Casimir geometry resulting in equivalent acceleration between hydrogen inside the cavity vs. outside. This has the unlikely consequence of time dilation and Lorentz contraction occurring to hydrogen inside the cavity relative to outside the cavity. The correct choice of material and geometry (Rayney nickel) can then act as a membrane to preferentially scale only the monatomic gas (Mills and Moddel) into what appears from our perspective to be increasingly smaller geometry where molecular gas can not follow, Then if these fractional atoms form a fractional molecule they become trapped just like the molecular gas left behind at the entrance when the atoms started diffusing into the increasingly smaller geometry of the cavity walls. The difference is that these fractional molecules that don’t even perceive themselves as fractional are trapped inside the membrane and when diffused by gas law will have their molecular bond broken by the confinement restoring monatomic energy levels and allowing the atoms to change to the new fractional value before finding another fractional atom to recombine into a different fractional molecule and give off the freely acquired energy as a photon. The cycle then cascades until the gas escapes or the heat destroys the cavity.
See updates and animations

As velocity approaches C on spatial axis( x=volume), Time axis is suppressed (event horizon),
As velocity approaches C on time axis (y= time), Volume axis is suppressed (Casimir cavity).